More Than Money Can Buy
By Philip J. Gill
System Criteria Report Card
United Grain Growers
Bantam Doubleday Dell
IS departments find that the real payoff in replacing mainframes
with Unix servers is added functionality, not cost savings.
To no one's surprise, money has been the most common motivation behind pulling
the plug on legacy IBM mainframes in favor of high-end Unix systems. Even
in cases where they didn't pull the plug, companies chose to forgo expensive
upgrades in favor of offloading new or rewritten core business applications
to high-end Unix servers. Yet however true and sensible this motivation
is, many users are finding that putting high-end Unix systems to work doing
a mainframe's job has benefits beyond saving money. "The cost issue
has somewhat lessened because costs have come down for proprietary systems
as well," says Jim Johnson, president of the Standish Group International,
a market research firm in Dennis, MA.
Indeed, International Data Corp. (IDC) of Framingham, MA, says IBM mainframe
and compatible vendors such as Amdahl Corp. shipped more units last year,
but they charged less for each box. Unit shipments increased between three
and four percent in 1995 over the year before, but the revenues they put
in manufacturers' coffers actually declined three percent. IDC predicts
more of the same for this year, when it expects similar advances in units
shipped but another three percent of negative growth revenues generated.
In the meantime, sales of large-scale Unix systems, including symmetric
multiprocessing (SMP) systems and massively parallel processing (MPP) systems,
continue to grow at a brisk pace, says Jean Bozman, an analyst in the Unix
and server operating environments service at IDC in Mountain View, CA. These
two categories of Unix systems provide the same or greater performance than
mainframes, usually at a lower cost, and have become popular substitutes
for data center operations.
Sales of Unix-based SMP and MPP systems increased 10 percent in 1995 over
the year before, while units shipped increased 12.4 percent, says IDC. That
trend should continue this year. IDC projects that the Unix market, excluding
workstations, will increase 20 percent in both revenues and units shipped.
One reason for this boom is that high-end Unix systems are regarded highly
in the information systems (IS) departments of large organizations. Unix
systems scored higher than proprietary legacy systems in 10 key selection
criteria in a recent Standish Group survey of 367 chief information officers
(CIOs) in Fortune 500 firms. The CIOs preferred Unix not just in
overall system costs and price/performance ratio, but also in system availability,
dependability, ease of growth, ease of support, ease of use, ease of installation,
security and the variety of applications available. (For details, see System
Criteria Report Card)
These same CIOs also rated Unix higher in seven out of 10 categories against
Microsoft's Windows NT Advanced Server (NT AS). Despite Microsoft's marketing
efforts, the CIOs scored Unix the winner in every category except ease of
use and installation and overall cost.
Johnson says that Unix systems scored so well against legacy and NT systems
because they are the only platforms available today that deliver the functionality
users need to run their businesses. In choosing what platform to build on,
Johnson says, users should concentrate on the availability of such things
as mission-critical software and applications, infrastructure solidity and
enhancements, Internet and electronic commerce technology, database technology
and development tools. "Unix has more in these scores than any other
operating system," he says.
While cost considerations remain important, they are no longer paramount.
Some users cite the extra or new functionality of Unix-based business application
software as their primary motive for trading in their mainframes for high-end
Unix systems. Others point to the easy growth path that Unix-based SMP and
MPP servers provide.
This is not to say that Unix still doesn't have a way to go to overcome
some old bugaboos. For instance, Unix still lags behind legacy systems in
systems management tools. Mainframes might have lost the edge in functionality,
but they will be around for a long time to come, users and analysts say.
"People have such an investment in these systems, it takes a long time
to write that off," says Roger Howard, a systems analyst at Hewitt
Associates, a benefits consulting firm in Lincolnshire, IL. His company
has offloaded some key business applications to Unix-based servers but retains
its three IBM mainframes for others.
"The mainframe isn't dead," says IDC's Bozman, "but many
companies are definitely planning for its retirement." The following
case studies show how three major user organizations are using high-end
Unix systems to replace their mainframes.
United Grain Growers
Change Begets Change
The first big change at United Grain Growers (UGG) came seven years ago,
when the Winnipeg, Manitoba-based organization transformed itself from a
nonprofit wheat farmers' wholesale and distribution cooperative into a profit-driven,
publicly traded corporation. Today, the $1.2 billion (US$875 million) firm,
listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange, operates 250 grain silos in Western
Canada, from where it buys, stores and transports grains for domestic and
international consumption. It also operates local retail operations at each
silo that sells farm goods and supplies.
When the nature of the company's operations changed, its information needs
changed as well. That prompted a reevaluation of its IT operations and eventually
a second big change. At the end of 1994, UGG pulled the plug on its IBM
ES/9000 mainframe. In its place, UGG installed a cluster of six Unix-based
Hewlett-Packard HP 9000 corporate business servers. Although it has saved
more than US$750,000 in reduced hardware and operating costs thus far, money
was not the main reason for the switch, says Guy Wood, director of MIS.
"Functionality was the main motivation for the change," explains
Wood. "We had not believed that our long-term future rested with mainframe
computing for some time before we actually replaced it. As early as 1992
we started to think about moving to client/server. The critical issue for
us is information--how we handle it and what information we give our managers
and employees to do their jobs."
UGG realized it needed better tools to present information to its users.
As in many other organizations, desktop PCs running Microsoft Windows and
personal productivity applications such as the Lotus 1-2-3 spreadsheet were
common throughout the organization. The graphical user interface and quick
response time those systems provide set users' expectations, and mainframes
could not live up to them. "We had some people working five hours a
day on Lotus on Windows, then going to [IBM] 3270 terminals and waiting
and waiting," says Wood. "They were not impressed."
Conversely, much of that mainframe data wasn't easily available to Lotus
users on the desktop. To satisfy their needs, UGG built a new client/server
infrastructure that ties all its users into the same network resources.
At the top sits the Unix cluster, located in the data center of the company's
Winnipeg headquarters. An Ethernet TCP/IP local-area network links together
the six systems, as well as local PC users.
The servers run a new set of core client/server business applications. The
SmartStream Financials suite from Dun & Bradstreet Software of Atlanta
runs on top of a Sybase System 10 relational database management system
(RDBMS), alongside a number of legacy applications written in the Natural
fourth-generation language (4GL) for the Adabas database, both from Software
AG of Reston, VA.
UGG also maintains a frame relay wide-area network that interconnects its
250 grain silos with corporate headquarters. Each silo has an HP 9000 Unix
server to support local operations, such as retail point-of-sale and monitoring
of grain stores. Each server has a dial-up connection to one of eight access
points in the corporate network.
The Desired Results
The new network has dramatically improved functionality, says Wood. Instead
of switching back and forth between PCs and 3270 terminals, users at company
headquarters now have one interface to corporate data: their PCs. They can
log onto and download information from the SmartStream Financials applications
running on the Unix servers, analyze the data in a local Lotus spreadsheet,
then upload the results back to the central servers.
The new environment meets a key requirement by supporting three kinds of
applications: batch, online and client/server. "We can mix all three,
according to what's best for the particular application," says Wood.
"We still use batch and online; they'll never go away. And we found
that client/server is the best architecture for applications where users
need to work with lots of data locally."
Wood believes the cost savings of moving off mainframes are widely misunderstood.
"People say that client/server costs less, then two years down the
road, they take a second look and say it costs more," says Wood. "Client/server
isn't so much cost savings as cost avoidance."
If your business is growing, either way of computing--mainframe or Unix-based
client/server--is going to cost more over time, says Wood. Any graphing
of computer operating expenses would start at a certain time and show costs
trending upward into the future. The difference, in his view, is that with
Unix systems, the chart starts at a much lower price point and stays lower
over time. "You've got two sloping lines," he adds. "One
is $1 million below the other."
UGG's cluster configuration provides another benefit the mainframe couldn't
supply. Each of the six systems is dedicated to a specific application,
such as the financials, or supporting incoming and outgoing information
requests from local users at the 250 silos.
If one HP 9000 should fail, the cluster configuration provides the network
with built-in redundancy. Another system can take up the slack with only
minor performance degradation, says Wood. This architecture also facilitates
system upgrades. Since its machines are dedicated systems, UGG can expand
the processing power application by application simply by adding extra processors
to the appropriate box. "We can keep operating on a seven-days-a-week,
24-hours-a-day basis," he adds.
Side By Side
UGG may have retired its mainframe completely, but far more common, say
analysts, is a weaning process. In these cases, high-end Unix systems often
reside in the data center next to the legacy systems. For example, Hewitt
Associates, a privately held benefits consulting and outsourcing firm in
Lincolnshire, IL, has begun to move key business applications to a Unix-based
system, while leaving other applications on its legacy IBM systems.
"It's more complementary to the mainframe than a replacement of it,"
explains Roger Howard. "We want to promote a better architecture, so
we have begun to migrate applications to an alternative platform where they've
got the MIPS and cycle time to run the applications the way we'd like."
The first application to be rewritten and moved to a high-end Unix environment
is a customer service application that manages information for deferred
benefits plans, such as 401K retirement plans. Written in the Oracle RDBMS,
the application resides on a pair of Nile SMP Unix systems, each with eight
CPUs, from Pyramid Technology of Mountain View, CA. An Information Systems
RM400 dual-CPU Unix system from Siemens-Nixdorf, Pyramid's parent company,
is the department's development machine.
Hewitt's customers are typically employees of companies that have outsourced
to it the management of their 401K plans. Hewitt provides an 800-number
voice response system for inquiries on such things as account balances,
updates, stock and mutual fund trades, and other information.
At any given point in the call, Howard explains, users can opt out of the
voice response system in favor of a live operator. Any information the caller
has entered via the telephone touchpad appears on the customer service representative's
computer screen. "This shortens the call and also makes the customer
feel better toward us. They feel like we know them," says Howard.
Cost was a major factor behind Hewitt's decision to move part of its operations
to Unix, but not the costs that first come to mind. Mainframes not only
cost more up front than high-end Unix systems, they carry more overhead.
"They're water-cooled, have high energy consumption rates and physically
take up a lot of floor space," says Howard.
In contrast, the Pyramid Unix systems not only cost less to buy, but they
require no water, less energy and less floor space. In addition to those
costs, Hewitt wanted to move key applications such as the customer service
inquiry operations to an architecture that could handle the load and provide
"The financial services industry today is pretty much a Unix industry,"
explains Howard. "That's because you simply couldn't get the amount
of transactions you need to do stock trades and the like on a mainframe.
The only thing right now that can handle that is Unix."
Unix systems also offer an easy upgrade path from SMP to MPP as transaction
needs increase. "It's an easy fit to move from one to the other,"
he says. The Nile systems can scale from two to over 100 processors.
To monitor and manage its growing transaction requirements, Hewitt has installed
UniKix, a Unix clone of the IBM mainframe CICS transaction processing (TP)
monitor from UniKix, Inc., of Phoenix. Howard says TP software is widely
available on high-end Unix systems today, unlike in the past. What still
remains a problem is systems management.
There's plenty of systems management software out there. The problem is
stability. Howard says it's difficult to find "best- of-breed"
tools whose developers are financially stable. "You don't know if some
of these vendors are going to be around in three to five years," he
says. "You have to evaluate these companies, their finances, their
partnerships with other vendors to see if they're going to be around for
the long term."
However, Howard says he isn't worried. "If it took 25 years for mainframes
to get there, the rationale with Unix is that, with all the attention and
market momentum it has, it will get there in half the time," says Howard.
"I think we'll see within the next five years a quantum leap in Unix
systems management tools."
Bantam Doubleday Dell
Driven by Software
For some users, it's the software that drives the change from legacy to
high-end Unix systems. That's the case at Bantam Doubleday Dell, the New
York-based trade book publisher. According to Bill Pratt, vice president
and CIO, Bantam Doubleday undertook the move to Unix and open systems because
it wanted to enable managers and staff to work in teams to achieve common
goals and objectives. "We wanted to reengineer some of our core processes
and align them back with systems initiatives," says Pratt. "To
do that, we needed to take applications that were vertically isolated processes
and flip those over into horizontally integrated processes."
Each of its major functional business areas operated more or less in isolation
from the others, and the company's computer systems reflected this fact,
says Pratt. For example, applications for administration, warehousing and
distribution functions could not easily exchange information.
An earlier effort to redesign the company's computer systems into a client/server
environment had failed, because the company had not undertaken initiatives
at the same time to redesign the business processes they supported. "Users
weren't involved," he says. "It was a tech push, rather than a
This time out, however, Bantam Doubleday has assembled cross-discipline
teams, including IS staff and business managers, to help guide the development
of the new systems. The team approach also is meant to foster the new mind-set
the company hopes to instill, that of having common goals and objectives
throughout the corporation.
To make this plan a success, the IT systems had to reflect and support the
philosophy. The IS department saw that a distributed computing architecture
could do that, but choosing the right software was key to making this happen.
The publisher chose R/3 business application software from SAP America of
Philadelphia, whose architecture permits information to flow between discrete
functions, such as sales and manufacturing.
Transition Under Way
In January, Bantam Doubleday, a subsidiary of privately held German publishing
media giant Bertelsmann, completed the first of a two-phase transition from
proprietary Digital Equipment Corp. VAX systems to a new three-tier client/server
network computing environment based on Unix and open technologies. The two
top tiers consist of HP 9000 Unix-based servers running the financial modules
of R/3 and Oracle's RDBMS connected to a bottom tier of Windows-based clients.
In phase two of its migration, scheduled for later this year, Bantam Doubleday
plans to install SAP's production planning, inventory or materials management,
and sales and distribution modules, along with a third-party warehouse management
system that plugs into the SAP environment. These new modules will integrate
and exchange information with SAP's financials, which have been in production
since the first of the year, says Pratt.
He also expects applications to flow more easily into Bantam Doubleday's
substantial electronic data interchange (EDI) efforts. About 70 percent
of its business transactions are handled electronically. Virtually all of
its transactions with large wholesalers and bookstore chains are done through
EDI, for instance.
Another part of phase two will address system management issues. Pratt says
Unix lags in critical areas of systems management tools, but he remains
hopeful the problems can be solved. He expects to address some major administration
concerns later this year when the company installs HP's OpenView network
and systems management framework.
Pratt doesn't necessarily expect the IS department to operate on less money,
though that may happen. Instead, he sees the department putting its money
to more beneficial purposes. "We're not doing this as a way to save
IS dollars," he says, "but I do think there's going to be a dramatic
change in where our dollars are spent."
About 10 percent of the IS budget under the old systems architecture was
spent in reconciling the results of one system against another, for example.
Since the applications weren't integrated, IS staff had to do the job. "That
cost should be totally eliminated," Pratt says.
The real savings for the company should come not from IT but from lower
business operating costs. Bantam Doubleday already has reduced inventory,
improved stock movement and lowered the cost of its business transactions.
And it's less than half finished with its transition to the new network
Philip J. Gill is a free-lance writer and editor based
in San Diego, CA. He can be reached at email@example.com.